insightsModel predictionprediction vs result
Zero Tenacity 68%Pipsqueak+4 32%
model prediction missed — breakdown insideDetails →
Game 1Pipsqueak+4 win2 : 2630:04
Zero Tenacity
bans






Pipsqueak+4
bans






Gold advantagePipsqueak+4Zero Tenacitypeak 27.9k
| Player | Lvl | K/D/A | NW | LH/DN | GPM | XPM | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 7/0/7 | 23.2k | 370/16 | 770 | 824 | ||
| 19 | 10/0/10 | 17.6k | 205/20 | 582 | 687 | ||
| 18 | 2/2/14 | 15.2k | 211/9 | 501 | 614 | ||
| 17 | 4/0/17 | 10.5k | 92/1 | 392 | 524 | ||
| 15 | 3/0/10 | 10.1k | 43/1 | 325 | 450 |
Game 2Pipsqueak+4 win18 : 2738:48
Zero Tenacity
bans






Pipsqueak+4
bans






Gold advantagePipsqueak+4Zero Tenacitypeak 22.5k
| Player | Lvl | K/D/A | NW | LH/DN | GPM | XPM | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 12/2/10 | 27.8k | 394/27 | 722 | 946 | ||
| 23 | 5/4/11 | 24.1k | 335/14 | 674 | 782 | ||
| 20 | 3/3/17 | 22.6k | 263/14 | 556 | 586 | ||
| 20 | 5/4/15 | 14.6k | 124/2 | 389 | 571 | ||
| 17 | 2/5/11 | 8.8k | 25/2 | 311 | 438 |
Head-to-head · Pipsqueak+4 leads 3–1