CCT 2026 Challengers Europe Series 3 · BO3
result vs prediction
Project 91#160 in the world · win 2:0series probability
52%48%
probability at match start · final 2:0
EC BANGA#272 in the world · loss 0:2The prediction was locked in using data as of the match start: map winrates, form and head-to-head were computed only from games before it began. This is how the model's honest accuracy is verified.
Map veto prediction
For each map — both teams' winrate over 3 months. The model guesses who bans it and who keeps it: teams remove maps where they are weaker and pull toward their strong ones.
MirageEC BANGA ban
57%33%
Project 91 · 3 mapsedge Project 91 +24%EC BANGA · 2 maps
AncientProject 91 pick
50%50%
Project 91 · 4 mapsnearly even +0%EC BANGA · 0 maps
Defaultpossible decider
50%43%
Project 91 · 0 mapsedge Project 91 +7%EC BANGA · 3 maps
Dust2EC BANGA ban
40%40%
Project 91 · 1 mapnearly even +0%EC BANGA · 1 map
InfernoProject 91 ban
40%60%
Project 91 · 1 mapedge EC BANGA +20%EC BANGA · 1 map
AnubisProject 91 ban
40%50%
Project 91 · 1 mapedge EC BANGA +10%EC BANGA · 0 maps
NukeEC BANGA pick
40%50%
Project 91 · 1 mapedge EC BANGA +10%EC BANGA · 0 maps
Most likely veto scenario
1. BanProject 91 remove Inferno
2. BanEC BANGA remove Dust2
3. PickProject 91 take Ancient
4. PickEC BANGA take Nuke
5. BanEC BANGA remove Mirage
6. BanProject 91 remove Anubis
DeciderDefault (50% / 43%)
Prediction by map vs result
Probabilities were locked in using statistics as of the match start (map winrate over the 3 months before it). We compare against the actual result of each map.
Nukeprediction missed13:5
Project 91 37%EC BANGA 63%
The model gave 63% on EC BANGA — the map was taken by Project 91.
Anubisprediction missed13:7
Project 91 43%EC BANGA 57%
The model gave 57% on EC BANGA — the map was taken by Project 91.
Model check result
Model favoriteProject 91 · 52%
Series resultProject 91 2:0
Series predictioncorrect
Accuracy by map0 of 2