?
IEM Beijing 2026 Asia Closed Qualifier · BO3
result vs prediction
Lynn Vision#31 in the world · loss 1:2
series probability
76%24%
probability at match start · final 1:2
DEPO#87 in the world · win 2:1
The prediction was locked in using data as of the match start: map winrates, form and head-to-head were computed only from games before it began. This is how the model's honest accuracy is verified.
Map veto prediction
For each map — both teams' winrate over 3 months. The model guesses who bans it and who keeps it: teams remove maps where they are weaker and pull toward their strong ones.
Dust2DEPO pick
38%54%
Lynn Vision · 9 mapsedge DEPO +16%DEPO · 9 maps
Ancientpossible decider
36%55%
Lynn Vision · 7 mapsedge DEPO +19%DEPO · 7 maps
InfernoLynn Vision pick
54%44%
Lynn Vision · 9 mapsedge Lynn Vision +10%DEPO · 5 maps
MirageLynn Vision ban
50%54%
Lynn Vision · 0 mapsnearly even -4%DEPO · 9 maps
AnubisDEPO ban
43%40%
Lynn Vision · 3 mapsnearly even +3%DEPO · 1 map
CacheLynn Vision ban
40%50%
Lynn Vision · 1 mapedge DEPO +10%DEPO · 2 maps
NukeDEPO ban
67%50%
Lynn Vision · 2 mapsedge Lynn Vision +17%DEPO · 0 maps
Most likely veto scenario
1. BanLynn Vision remove Mirage
2. BanDEPO remove Nuke
3. PickLynn Vision take Inferno
4. PickDEPO take Dust2
5. BanDEPO remove Anubis
6. BanLynn Vision remove Cache
DeciderAncient (36% / 55%)
Prediction by map vs result
Probabilities were locked in using statistics as of the match start (map winrate over the 3 months before it). We compare against the actual result of each map.
Ancientprediction correct7:13
Lynn Vision 30%DEPO 70%
The model gave 70% on DEPO — the map was taken by DEPO.
Dust2prediction missed13:5
Lynn Vision 38%DEPO 62%
The model gave 62% on DEPO — the map was taken by Lynn Vision.
Cacheprediction correct4:13
Lynn Vision 40%DEPO 60%
The model gave 60% on DEPO — the map was taken by DEPO.
Model check result
Model favoriteLynn Vision · 76%
Series resultDEPO 1:2
Series predictionmissed
Accuracy by map2 of 3