?
Logitech G Play Connect 2026 Closed Qualifier · BO3
result vs prediction
EAC#76 in the world · loss 0:2
series probability
60%40%
probability at match start · final 0:2
QUAZAR#94 in the world · win 2:0
The prediction was locked in using data as of the match start: map winrates, form and head-to-head were computed only from games before it began. This is how the model's honest accuracy is verified.
Map veto prediction
For each map — both teams' winrate over 3 months. The model guesses who bans it and who keeps it: teams remove maps where they are weaker and pull toward their strong ones.
MirageQUAZAR pick
57%75%
EAC · 17 mapsedge QUAZAR +18%QUAZAR · 8 maps
Anubispossible decider
53%58%
EAC · 11 mapsedge QUAZAR +5%QUAZAR · 8 maps
AncientQUAZAR ban
55%50%
EAC · 16 mapsedge EAC +5%QUAZAR · 0 maps
CacheEAC pick
62%55%
EAC · 9 mapsedge EAC +7%QUAZAR · 7 maps
NukeQUAZAR ban
50%50%
EAC · 8 mapsnearly even +0%QUAZAR · 8 maps
InfernoEAC ban
25%60%
EAC · 8 mapsedge QUAZAR +35%QUAZAR · 6 maps
Dust2EAC ban
40%50%
EAC · 1 mapedge QUAZAR +10%QUAZAR · 8 maps
Most likely veto scenario
1. BanEAC remove Dust2
2. BanQUAZAR remove Ancient
3. PickEAC take Cache
4. PickQUAZAR take Mirage
5. BanQUAZAR remove Nuke
6. BanEAC remove Inferno
DeciderAnubis (53% / 58%)
Prediction by map vs result
Probabilities were locked in using statistics as of the match start (map winrate over the 3 months before it). We compare against the actual result of each map.
Nukeprediction missed10:13
EAC 53%QUAZAR 47%
The model gave 53% on EAC — the map was taken by QUAZAR.
Mirageprediction correct9:13
EAC 28%QUAZAR 72%
The model gave 72% on QUAZAR — the map was taken by QUAZAR.
Model check result
Model favoriteEAC · 60%
Series resultQUAZAR 0:2
Series predictionmissed
Accuracy by map1 of 2