CCT 2026 Contenders Europe Series 5 · BO3
result vs prediction
CYBERSHOKE Prospects#123 in the world · loss 0:2series probability
66%34%
probability at match start · final 0:2
Endless Journey#170 in the world · win 2:0The prediction was locked in using data as of the match start: map winrates, form and head-to-head were computed only from games before it began. This is how the model's honest accuracy is verified.
Map veto prediction
For each map — both teams' winrate over 3 months. The model guesses who bans it and who keeps it: teams remove maps where they are weaker and pull toward their strong ones.
NukeEndless Journey ban
60%50%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 1 mapedge CYBERSHOKE Prospects +10%Endless Journey · 2 maps
AncientCYBERSHOKE Prospects pick
60%60%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 1 mapnearly even +0%Endless Journey · 1 map
Dust2Endless Journey pick
50%60%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 0 mapsedge Endless Journey +10%Endless Journey · 1 map
InfernoEndless Journey ban
50%40%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 0 mapsedge CYBERSHOKE Prospects +10%Endless Journey · 1 map
OverpassCYBERSHOKE Prospects ban
50%60%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 0 mapsedge Endless Journey +10%Endless Journey · 1 map
Most likely veto scenario
1. BanCYBERSHOKE Prospects remove Overpass
2. BanEndless Journey remove Inferno
3. PickCYBERSHOKE Prospects take Ancient
4. PickEndless Journey take Dust2
5. BanEndless Journey remove Nuke
Prediction by map vs result
Probabilities were locked in using statistics as of the match start (map winrate over the 3 months before it). We compare against the actual result of each map.
Mirageprediction missed7:13
CYBERSHOKE Prospects 53%Endless Journey 47%
The model gave 53% on CYBERSHOKE Prospects — the map was taken by Endless Journey.
Nukeprediction missed7:13
CYBERSHOKE Prospects 57%Endless Journey 43%
The model gave 57% on CYBERSHOKE Prospects — the map was taken by Endless Journey.
Model check result
Model favoriteCYBERSHOKE Prospects · 66%
Series resultEndless Journey 0:2
Series predictionmissed
Accuracy by map0 of 2