insightsModel predictionprediction vs result
Zero Tenacity 38%Pipsqueak+4 62%
model prediction came true — breakdown insideDetails →
Game 1Pipsqueak+4 win9 : 1729:43
Zero Tenacity
bans






Pipsqueak+4
bans






Gold advantagePipsqueak+4Zero Tenacitypeak 9.2k
| Player | Lvl | K/D/A | NW | LH/DN | GPM | XPM | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 6/1/7 | 22.6k | 373/5 | 767 | 1006 | ||
| 18 | 4/0/8 | 17.6k | 237/8 | 583 | 621 | ||
| 18 | 2/3/9 | 14.5k | 203/5 | 492 | 601 | ||
| 18 | 3/3/11 | 9.0k | 98/2 | 345 | 601 | ||
| 16 | 2/2/13 | 7.9k | 39/4 | 313 | 504 |
Game 2Pipsqueak+4 win20 : 3236:52
Zero Tenacity
bans






Pipsqueak+4
bans






Gold advantageZero TenacityPipsqueak+4peak 21.7k
| Player | Lvl | K/D/A | NW | LH/DN | GPM | XPM | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 8/2/13 | 27.9k | 539/11 | 880 | 998 | ||
| 25 | 15/2/7 | 24.0k | 335/17 | 706 | 982 | ||
| 22 | 7/2/17 | 20.1k | 208/10 | 561 | 761 | ||
| 18 | 0/5/21 | 14.0k | 129/3 | 392 | 517 | ||
| 17 | 2/9/19 | 9.4k | 43/3 | 327 | 430 |
Head-to-head · Pipsqueak+4 leads 3–1