CCT 2026 Contenders Europe Series 5 · BO3
result vs predictionseries probability
34%66%
probability at match start · final 0:2
CYBERSHOKE Prospects#124 in the world · win 2:0The prediction was locked in using data as of the match start: map winrates, form and head-to-head were computed only from games before it began. This is how the model's honest accuracy is verified.
Map veto prediction
For each map — both teams' winrate over 3 months. The model guesses who bans it and who keeps it: teams remove maps where they are weaker and pull toward their strong ones.
Dust2CYBERSHOKE Prospects pick
60%60%
SHISHKA · 1 mapnearly even +0%CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 1 map
AncientCYBERSHOKE Prospects ban
60%50%
SHISHKA · 1 mapedge SHISHKA +10%CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 0 maps
AnubisSHISHKA pick
50%40%
SHISHKA · 0 mapsedge SHISHKA +10%CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 1 map
InfernoSHISHKA ban
50%60%
SHISHKA · 0 mapsedge CYBERSHOKE Prospects +10%CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 1 map
NukeCYBERSHOKE Prospects ban
40%50%
SHISHKA · 1 mapedge CYBERSHOKE Prospects +10%CYBERSHOKE Prospects · 0 maps
Most likely veto scenario
1. BanSHISHKA remove Inferno
2. BanCYBERSHOKE Prospects remove Nuke
3. PickSHISHKA take Anubis
4. PickCYBERSHOKE Prospects take Dust2
5. BanCYBERSHOKE Prospects remove Ancient
Prediction by map vs result
Probabilities were locked in using statistics as of the match start (map winrate over the 3 months before it). We compare against the actual result of each map.
Ancientprediction missed4:13
SHISHKA 57%CYBERSHOKE Prospects 43%
The model gave 57% on SHISHKA — the map was taken by CYBERSHOKE Prospects.
Nukeprediction correct10:13
SHISHKA 43%CYBERSHOKE Prospects 57%
The model gave 57% on CYBERSHOKE Prospects — the map was taken by CYBERSHOKE Prospects.
Model check result
Model favoriteCYBERSHOKE Prospects · 66%
Series resultCYBERSHOKE Prospects 0:2
Series predictioncorrect
Accuracy by map1 of 2